A gaiter, frequently constructed from durable materials such as leather or heavy cloth, serves as a protective covering for the ankle and instep. These coverings typically fasten around the shoe and extend upwards, safeguarding the lower leg from the elements, debris, or injury. A classic example might involve equestrians utilizing them to protect their boots and trousers while riding.
The utilization of this type of leg covering has a long and varied history, providing practical benefits in diverse settings. Historically, these coverings offered protection against mud, snow, and sharp vegetation. Their durability made them popular among soldiers, hunters, and laborers operating in challenging environments. Furthermore, certain designs can impart a degree of lower leg support and stability.
The subsequent sections will delve into specific construction materials, design variations, and functional applications. This exploration will further elucidate the breadth and enduring utility of these protective leg coverings, particularly within the context of outdoor activities and specialized professions.
1. Ankle and Instep
The ankle and instep represent critical anatomical regions directly addressed by protective leg coverings. The design and functionality of these coverings are intimately linked to the specific vulnerabilities and requirements of these areas, warranting a focused analysis of their interplay.
-
Protection Against Impact and Abrasion
The primary function involves shielding the ankle and instep from potential impacts and abrasive forces. In environments with uneven terrain or dense vegetation, these areas are particularly susceptible to injury. The design of the covering often incorporates reinforced materials or padding to mitigate such risks. An example would be a leather version used by hikers traversing rocky landscapes, safeguarding against scrapes and cuts.
-
Environmental Barrier
Beyond physical protection, gaiters serve as a barrier against environmental elements, particularly moisture and debris. The ankle joint, with its complex articulation, is vulnerable to water ingress, which can lead to discomfort, blistering, or even hypothermia in prolonged exposure. Similarly, the instep is prone to accumulating small stones and other detritus, causing irritation and potentially damaging footwear. Closures and fitted designs are critical to effective sealing.
-
Support and Stabilization
While not a primary function of all designs, certain iterations provide a degree of support to the ankle joint. This is particularly relevant in activities requiring significant lateral movement or carrying heavy loads. By restricting excessive ankle movement, the risk of sprains and strains can be reduced. This feature might be incorporated into the design of tactical or military versions.
-
Interface with Footwear
A critical aspect of gaiter design is its seamless integration with footwear. The method of attachment, whether through straps, buckles, or elastic closures, directly impacts the effectiveness of the garment. A poorly designed interface can lead to slippage, discomfort, or a compromise in the protective seal. Proper sizing and compatibility with intended footwear are essential for optimal performance.
The features discussed underscore the vital role these anatomical regions play in defining the requirements and design considerations of protective leg coverings. From impact resistance to environmental sealing and footwear integration, the garment is intricately linked to the specific needs of the ankle and instep, reflecting an ongoing evolution to meet the challenges posed by diverse environments and activities.
2. Protective leg covering
The designation of an item as a “protective leg covering” directly defines its core function: shielding the lower leg from external elements or potential hazards. Within the context of the subject being explored, such a covering acts as a foundational component. The effectiveness of such an article hinges upon its ability to mitigate risks presented by the environment, terrain, or specific activity for which it is intended. For instance, a heavy-duty canvas covering used in forestry protects against sharp undergrowth and potential abrasions from heavy equipment. The material selection, design, and method of securing the covering all contribute directly to its protective capabilities. Failure to adequately address these factors compromises its primary purpose and renders it ineffective.
Further illustrating this connection, consider the application in equestrian activities. Leather versions provide protection against chafing from saddle straps and potential impacts from branches during trail riding. In contrast, lightweight, waterproof versions designed for hiking prioritize shielding against moisture and debris, preventing discomfort and potential skin irritation. Similarly, specialized coverings employed in construction environments are often manufactured from high-visibility, abrasion-resistant materials to enhance safety and prevent injuries from dropped objects or equipment. The specific demands of the activity, therefore, dictate the precise characteristics required of an effective protective covering, solidifying its role as a crucial element.
In summary, the essence of the item lies within its capacity as a “protective leg covering.” The garment’s value is directly correlated to its ability to safeguard the lower leg, the effectiveness of which is determined by a confluence of design, material selection, and intended application. Understanding this core principle is essential for evaluating suitability and optimizing performance across a spectrum of activities and environments. This foundational purpose shapes the construction and functional design.
3. Material Durability
Material durability is a paramount factor governing the efficacy and longevity of lower leg coverings. The selection of materials directly influences the garment’s resistance to environmental stressors, physical abrasions, and general wear and tear, thereby determining its suitability for specific applications. The inherent strength, resistance to degradation, and structural integrity of the chosen material are critical considerations.
-
Abrasion Resistance
The ability of a material to withstand surface damage from rubbing or friction is crucial in environments characterized by rough terrain or close contact with abrasive surfaces. For example, a ballistic nylon construction is often favored in military applications due to its superior resistance to tearing and abrasion compared to lighter-weight synthetic fabrics. Coverings employed in such contexts must endure repeated contact with rocks, vegetation, and equipment without compromising structural integrity or protective capabilities.
-
Water Resistance and Waterproofing
Materials intended for use in wet or humid environments must exhibit either inherent water resistance or be treated with a water-repellent coating or membrane. While water-resistant materials offer a degree of protection against light moisture, fully waterproof materials provide a more comprehensive barrier against water penetration. For instance, a covering constructed from laminated fabrics or coated with a durable water repellent (DWR) finish is better suited for prolonged exposure to rain or snow. The degradation of these treatments over time, however, requires periodic reapplication to maintain optimal performance.
-
Tensile Strength and Tear Resistance
The ability of a material to withstand pulling forces (tensile strength) and resist tearing or ripping (tear resistance) are critical for preventing catastrophic failure under stress. Materials with high tensile strength and tear resistance, such as reinforced nylon or leather, are better suited for demanding applications where the risk of snagging or puncture is high. Consider the requirements for equestrian coverings, which must withstand the stresses imposed by riding and potential contact with branches or fencing.
-
Resistance to Environmental Degradation
Prolonged exposure to sunlight, extreme temperatures, and chemical substances can degrade certain materials, leading to reduced performance and shortened lifespan. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation, for instance, can weaken synthetic fibers and cause discoloration. Similarly, exposure to harsh chemicals or cleaning agents can compromise the integrity of protective coatings and membranes. Materials with inherent resistance to environmental degradation or those treated with protective finishes are essential for applications involving prolonged outdoor use.
The long-term performance and utility are directly proportional to the quality and appropriateness of the materials employed. By selecting materials with the requisite durability characteristics, manufacturers ensure that the covering effectively fulfills its intended function, safeguarding the lower leg from potential hazards and extending the lifespan of the equipment.
4. Attachment mechanism
The method by which a protective lower leg covering is secured is critical to its function and effectiveness. The attachment mechanism dictates the ease of donning and doffing, the security of the fit during activity, and ultimately, the level of protection afforded. A poorly designed or implemented attachment can render even the most durable covering ineffective. The attachment’s design must account for the intended use, the type of footwear worn, and the range of motion required. Various attachment methods exist, each with inherent strengths and weaknesses. Straps and buckles provide a secure and adjustable fit but may be cumbersome to manipulate. Elastic closures offer ease of use but may lack the necessary security for demanding activities. Zippers provide a quick and reliable closure but may be prone to failure in harsh conditions. The chosen attachment mechanism must balance these factors to optimize performance and user experience. Consider a mountaineering boot covering; this typically employs a combination of buckles, straps, and drawcords to ensure a secure and adaptable fit over bulky boots, even in extreme cold and challenging terrain.
The interface between the attachment mechanism and the underlying footwear is of particular importance. The attachment must be compatible with the shape and size of the footwear to ensure a snug and secure fit without causing discomfort or restricting movement. Incompatible attachment methods can lead to slippage, abrasion, and reduced protection. For example, gaiters intended for use with ski boots often feature specialized buckles and straps designed to integrate seamlessly with the boot’s shell and prevent snow from entering the boot-gaiter interface. This integration is crucial for maintaining warmth and dryness in frigid conditions. The design of the closure mechanism should prioritize ease of use, even when the user is wearing gloves or operating in challenging conditions. Simplicity and intuitiveness are key factors in ensuring that the covering can be quickly and reliably secured, even in time-sensitive situations.
In conclusion, the attachment mechanism is not merely an ancillary feature but an integral component that significantly impacts the overall functionality. The effectiveness as a protective leg covering hinges on a carefully considered design that balances security, adjustability, ease of use, and compatibility with footwear. A robust and well-integrated attachment mechanism ensures the leg covering remains securely in place, providing reliable protection and enhancing user confidence across a range of activities and environments. Ongoing refinements in attachment technologies continue to improve the performance and user experience, highlighting the enduring importance of this critical design element.
5. Environmental safeguard
The capacity of an item to function as an environmental safeguard directly relates to its protective capabilities against external conditions. With respect to lower leg coverings, this aspect is paramount, dictating the extent to which the covering shields the wearer from environmental hazards. The degree of protection afforded determines its suitability for diverse climates and terrains. This analysis details key facets of its role as an environmental barrier.
-
Barrier Against Moisture
The capacity to impede water penetration is a crucial component of environmental safeguarding. Materials and designs that effectively prevent moisture from reaching the skin mitigate the risk of discomfort, blistering, and hypothermia. Waterproof membranes and water-resistant treatments are commonly employed to achieve this protection. For example, a covering intended for use in wet or snowy conditions will invariably incorporate a waterproof layer to maintain dryness and warmth.
-
Protection Against Debris
An effective barrier against particulate matter such as dirt, gravel, and vegetation is essential for preventing irritation and injury. Closures and fitted designs are crucial for minimizing the ingress of debris. A construction worker using a durable covering in a construction site benefits from preventing concrete dust and small debris from entering the footwear, which can lead to discomfort and potential abrasions.
-
Insulation and Thermal Regulation
The ability to provide insulation and regulate temperature is vital for maintaining comfort and preventing heat loss or gain. Insulating materials trap air, creating a barrier against temperature extremes. In cold climates, a thermally insulated covering prevents heat from escaping the lower leg, while in hot climates, a breathable design facilitates ventilation to prevent overheating. For example, in mountaineering, insulated coverings can prevent frostbite and maintain optimal blood circulation during high-altitude treks.
-
Protection Against UV Radiation
Prolonged exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation can damage the skin and accelerate the degradation of materials. Coverings constructed from UV-resistant materials provide a degree of protection against harmful UV rays, reducing the risk of sunburn and material deterioration. This feature is particularly relevant for individuals spending extended periods outdoors in sunny environments.
The confluence of these environmental safeguards dictates the overall utility and effectiveness. A versatile design effectively mitigates multiple environmental threats, ensuring comfort, safety, and prolonged use. The integration of these safeguards highlights its importance as a protective garment across diverse conditions and activities. This multifactorial safeguarding establishes its utility across diverse environments and activities.
6. Historical usage
The historical usage of lower leg coverings provides essential context for understanding their evolution and enduring relevance. Examining past applications illuminates their fundamental purpose and highlights adaptations to meet specific societal and environmental demands.
-
Military Applications
Throughout history, military forces have employed lower leg coverings for protection and support. Ancient Roman legionaries wore ocreae, metal greaves, for defense against bladed weapons. Similarly, gaiters, often constructed of leather or heavy canvas, were standard issue in European armies until the early 20th century, providing protection against mud, thorns, and low-level impacts. These coverings demonstrated a consistent need for lower leg protection in combat environments. The transition from rigid metal to more flexible materials reflects an evolving understanding of battlefield mobility and the need to balance protection with agility.
-
Equestrian Traditions
Lower leg coverings have long been integral to equestrian activities. Riding boots themselves offer protection and support, but additional coverings, such as half-chaps or gaiters, provide further safeguarding against chafing from saddle straps and contact with the horse’s flanks. These coverings also protect the rider’s trousers from mud and dirt. The design and materials used in equestrian coverings have evolved over time, from simple leather wraps to more sophisticated designs incorporating synthetic materials for improved comfort and durability. This reflects a continuous effort to enhance both the rider’s safety and the longevity of their riding apparel.
-
Working-Class Attire
Throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, laborers in various industries frequently wore lower leg coverings. Agricultural workers, miners, and railway employees utilized these garments for protection against the elements, sharp objects, and potential injuries. Spats, a type of covering that typically covered the shoe and ankle, were a common sight among white-collar workers, providing a measure of protection from mud and dirt while maintaining a professional appearance. These examples illustrate how utilitarian concerns shaped the design and adoption of lower leg coverings across different social classes and occupational settings.
-
Symbolism and Fashion
Beyond their practical applications, lower leg coverings have occasionally served symbolic or fashionable purposes. In certain historical periods, specific styles or materials of coverings were associated with particular social classes or cultural groups. For example, ornate designs might denote wealth or status. Similarly, leggings and gaiters have experienced periods of popularity as fashion items, transcending their original utilitarian function. These instances demonstrate how a practical garment can acquire additional layers of meaning and significance within a broader cultural context.
These varied historical applications demonstrate that lower leg coverings have consistently served as a practical and adaptable solution for protecting the lower leg in diverse environments and activities. From the battlefield to the workplace, and even within the realm of fashion, these coverings have evolved to meet changing needs and reflect evolving societal values. Understanding this historical context provides valuable insight into the enduring relevance and versatility of these protective garments.
7. Support and stability
The provision of support and stability represents a significant, albeit sometimes secondary, function within the category of protective lower leg coverings. While primary objectives often center on shielding against environmental hazards and physical abrasions, certain designs inherently contribute to enhanced joint stabilization and reduced risk of injury. This facet warrants specific examination to understand its implications for functionality and application.
-
Ankle Joint Stabilization
Constricting or compressive designs can provide external support to the ankle joint, limiting excessive range of motion and reducing the likelihood of sprains or strains. This support is particularly relevant in activities involving uneven terrain or requiring rapid changes in direction. A tightly laced leather gaiter, for example, can provide a degree of ankle stability comparable to that offered by certain athletic braces. The degree of support is dependent on the material’s rigidity and the tightness of the fit.
-
Proprioceptive Enhancement
The application of pressure and tactile feedback can stimulate proprioceptive awareness, improving the wearer’s sense of balance and body position. This enhanced awareness can contribute to improved stability and coordination, particularly in challenging environments. A compression-style sock extending to cover the ankle, combined with a fitted covering, may offer this proprioceptive benefit. This is particularly useful in activities requiring fine motor control and precise foot placement.
-
Load Distribution
Certain designs can assist in distributing weight and reducing stress on the lower leg muscles and joints. This is especially pertinent in activities involving heavy loads or prolonged standing. A rigid or semi-rigid covering, such as that found in some specialized workwear, can help transfer weight from the ankles and lower legs to the surrounding structure, reducing fatigue and the risk of overuse injuries. This load distribution can be valuable for those who engage in prolonged periods of carrying heavy equipment, reducing long-term physical strain.
-
Postural Alignment
While not a direct function of all protective coverings, some designs, particularly those extending higher up the leg, can influence posture and alignment. By providing support to the lower leg, these coverings can encourage a more upright stance and reduce strain on the back and hips. This postural influence is most noticeable in designs incorporating rigid or semi-rigid elements. The postural advantages, while subtle, can contribute to improved comfort and reduced risk of musculoskeletal problems over time.
In conclusion, the incorporation of support and stability features into protective lower leg coverings presents a multifaceted benefit, extending beyond simple environmental protection. The degree of support and stability provided varies based on design and materials, making it a significant consideration when selecting a covering for specific activities or occupational needs. Understanding these implications allows for a more informed decision-making process, optimizing both safety and performance.
8. Design variation
The breadth of design variations observed in lower leg coverings reflects an ongoing adaptation to diverse functional requirements and aesthetic preferences. These variations encompass material selection, closure mechanisms, height, and intended application, significantly impacting the covering’s overall performance and suitability.
-
Material Composition and Construction
Variations in material composition profoundly influence the covering’s durability, water resistance, and breathability. Leather offers abrasion resistance and a traditional aesthetic, while synthetic fabrics, such as nylon and polyester, provide lightweight durability and water resistance. The construction method, whether woven, knitted, or laminated, further affects these properties. For example, a covering designed for heavy-duty use in rugged terrain might utilize ballistic nylon with reinforced stitching, whereas a covering intended for light hiking might employ a lightweight, breathable nylon with minimal reinforcement.
-
Closure Mechanisms and Adjustability
Closure mechanisms dictate the ease of donning and doffing, as well as the security of the fit. Options include buckles, straps, zippers, elastic closures, and hook-and-loop fasteners. The choice of closure mechanism depends on the intended use and the desired level of adjustability. A covering designed for quick deployment in emergency situations might utilize a simple hook-and-loop closure, while a covering intended for mountaineering might employ a combination of buckles and straps for a secure and adjustable fit over bulky boots.
-
Height and Coverage Area
The height of the covering determines the area of the lower leg that is protected. Short gaiters, also known as ankle gaiters, provide minimal coverage, primarily protecting the ankle and instep from debris. Tall gaiters, extending to the knee or higher, offer comprehensive protection against snow, water, and vegetation. The choice of height depends on the environmental conditions and the level of protection required. A runner traversing a muddy trail might opt for short gaiters, while a snowshoer in deep powder might require tall gaiters.
-
Intended Application and Specialization
Design variations often reflect the intended application. Coverings designed for military use prioritize durability, camouflage, and compatibility with tactical gear. Equestrian designs emphasize comfort, protection from chafing, and a traditional aesthetic. Industrial designs focus on durability, visibility, and protection against workplace hazards. These specializations demonstrate how the design of a lower leg covering is tailored to meet the specific needs of its intended user. Each niche necessitates a carefully considered design.
These design variations underscore the adaptability of lower leg coverings to diverse functional requirements and aesthetic preferences. By carefully considering material composition, closure mechanisms, height, and intended application, manufacturers can create coverings that effectively address the needs of a wide range of users and environments, from mountaineers and soldiers to equestrians and construction workers. These adaptations underscore the lasting utility and relevance of this versatile garment.
9. Functional application
The “functional application” of lower leg coverings directly dictates their design, material selection, and overall effectiveness. This concept emphasizes the importance of tailoring the covering to meet the specific demands of the intended activity or environment, thereby maximizing its utility and protective capabilities.
-
Industrial Safety and Protection
In industrial settings, lower leg coverings serve a critical safety function, protecting workers from a range of hazards. Examples include construction workers using high-visibility, abrasion-resistant coverings to guard against dropped objects, sharp materials, and potential impacts. Chemical-resistant coverings protect workers from splashes and spills in laboratories or manufacturing plants. The functional application here is explicitly geared towards hazard mitigation and adherence to safety regulations.
-
Outdoor Recreation and Environmental Protection
For outdoor enthusiasts, functional application focuses on shielding the lower leg from environmental elements. Hikers and backpackers utilize waterproof and breathable coverings to protect against rain, snow, and mud, maintaining comfort and preventing moisture-related injuries. Hunters and anglers might employ specialized coverings for camouflage and protection against thorns, insects, and water. The performance is intricately tied to adapting to variable weather conditions and terrain.
-
Medical and Therapeutic Purposes
Lower leg coverings also find applications in medical and therapeutic contexts. Compression coverings can improve circulation, reduce swelling, and aid in the recovery from injuries. Specialized designs provide support and stability to the ankle joint, assisting in rehabilitation or preventing further injury. These applications demand precise fit, material properties, and compression levels to achieve the desired therapeutic effect.
-
Equestrian Sports and Performance Enhancement
In equestrian sports, functional application extends beyond mere protection. Riding boots and associated coverings provide support, grip, and protection from chafing. Specialized designs can enhance the rider’s connection with the horse, improving control and performance. Jodhpur pants, combined with paddock boots and half-chaps, exemplify a tailored design that balances functionality with aesthetics and tradition.
Linking these diverse applications back to the core concept reveals that the items effectiveness is intrinsically tied to its ability to fulfill a specific purpose. Whether safeguarding against industrial hazards, environmental elements, or providing medical support, the thoughtful adaptation to the intended application distinguishes it from a mere fashion accessory to an indispensable tool. This adaptability reinforces its enduring relevance across a spectrum of activities and professions.
Frequently Asked Questions about Gaiters
This section addresses common queries surrounding these protective leg coverings, providing clear and concise answers to enhance understanding of their purpose and function.
Question 1: What defines a gaiter as distinct from other types of legwear?
A gaiter is characterized by its primary function as a protective covering for the ankle and lower leg, designed to shield against environmental elements or physical hazards. This distinguishes it from leggings or tights, which primarily serve as insulating garments or fashion items.
Question 2: What are the primary materials used in the construction of gaiters?
Common materials include leather, canvas, nylon, and various synthetic fabrics. The choice of material depends on the intended application, with considerations for durability, water resistance, and breathability.
Question 3: How should one determine the appropriate size and fit?
Proper sizing is crucial for optimal performance. Measurements should be taken of the ankle circumference and the height from the ankle to the desired coverage point. Compatibility with intended footwear should also be considered to ensure a secure and comfortable fit.
Question 4: What are the key considerations for selecting a gaiter for hiking or backpacking?
Important factors include water resistance, breathability, durability, and ease of use. The covering should be lightweight, packable, and compatible with hiking boots. The height should be appropriate for the expected terrain and weather conditions.
Question 5: How should gaiters be properly cared for and maintained?
Care instructions vary depending on the material. Generally, gaiters should be cleaned regularly with a mild detergent and allowed to air dry. Leather versions may require periodic conditioning to maintain suppleness. Waterproof coverings may require re-treatment with a water-repellent spray to maintain their protective properties.
Question 6: Do gaiters offer any benefits beyond environmental protection?
Some designs provide a degree of ankle support and stabilization, reducing the risk of sprains or strains. Compression-style gaiters can improve circulation and reduce swelling. These benefits vary depending on the design and material.
This exploration highlights the key aspects of gaiters, providing a foundational understanding of their diverse applications and benefits.
The subsequent discussion will delve into the future trends and innovations in the realm of lower leg coverings.
Optimizing the Utility of Protective Ankle and Instep Coverings
Maximizing the effectiveness of coverings requires careful consideration of several factors. This section outlines key tips for ensuring proper selection, usage, and maintenance, thereby enhancing their protective capabilities and prolonging their lifespan.
Tip 1: Assess Environmental Risks.
Identify potential hazards within the intended environment. Factors such as terrain, weather conditions, and potential for sharp objects or abrasive surfaces dictate material selection and design features. For example, rocky terrain necessitates a covering with high abrasion resistance, while wet conditions mandate waterproof materials.
Tip 2: Prioritize Proper Fit.
Ensure a snug and secure fit without restricting movement. Ill-fitting coverings can compromise protection, cause discomfort, and increase the risk of slippage. Refer to manufacturer sizing charts and consider trying the covering on with the intended footwear.
Tip 3: Select Appropriate Materials.
Choose materials that align with the environmental risks and activity level. Leather offers durability and abrasion resistance, while synthetic fabrics provide lightweight water resistance and breathability. Consider the specific properties of each material to optimize performance.
Tip 4: Implement Proper Closure Techniques.
Secure closures properly to prevent debris from entering and compromising protection. Ensure buckles, straps, or zippers are fully fastened and adjusted to maintain a snug fit. Regularly inspect closures for wear and tear and replace as needed.
Tip 5: Employ Regular Cleaning and Maintenance.
Clean coverings regularly according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Remove dirt, mud, and debris to prevent material degradation and maintain breathability. Apply appropriate treatments, such as waterproofing sprays or leather conditioners, to preserve their protective properties.
Tip 6: Inspect for Damage Regularly.
Examine the covering for signs of wear and tear, such as rips, tears, or worn closures. Address any damage promptly to maintain its protective capabilities. Replace coverings that exhibit significant damage or compromised performance.
Tip 7: Layering strategy for weather impact.
Think about how the coverings work with your socks and pants to manage moisture and warmth. In cooler conditions, thicker socks might improve comfort and warmth. Consider using breathable, moisture-wicking socks to keep moisture away when it is warmer. These tips enhance effectiveness.
Adhering to these guidelines optimizes the performance and longevity of protective coverings, ensuring reliable protection in diverse environments and activities.
This concludes the practical recommendations for maximizing the utility. The subsequent section provides a summary of the key benefits of protective coverings.
Concluding Remarks
The preceding analysis has elucidated the multifaceted nature of “what is a spat clothing,” emphasizing its role as a protective lower leg covering. The exploration spanned its defining attributes, material durability, attachment mechanisms, environmental safeguarding capabilities, historical applications, support features, design variations, and functional utility across diverse settings. This comprehensive overview underscores the garment’s adaptation to meet specific environmental challenges and occupational hazards.
The enduring relevance of this protective wear stems from its inherent ability to mitigate risks to the lower leg. Continued advancements in materials and design promise further enhancements in performance and comfort. The judicious selection and proper maintenance of these coverings are paramount to maximizing their protective potential and ensuring their long-term effectiveness in safeguarding the wearer.
