The inquiry into scriptural passages addressing a man’s union with multiple women primarily involves examining Old Testament texts. These passages do not explicitly command such unions but rather describe instances and regulated practices of polygamy and concubinage within the ancient Israelite society. These accounts often stem from specific socio-economic conditions such as ensuring offspring or providing for widows.
Understanding the historical context is vital. The practices were interwoven with issues of lineage, inheritance, and social stability in a time vastly different from modern societal norms. Certain instances, such as levirate marriage where a brother was obligated to marry his deceased brothers widow to continue his line, served distinct societal purposes. Furthermore, regulations within the Law of Moses attempted to mitigate potential injustices arising from these relationships, focusing on ensuring the first wifes rights were protected and providing fair treatment to all children.
The subsequent sections will delve into specific biblical narratives and legal codes that portray these complex relationships. A closer inspection of these scriptures offers insights into the cultural, social, and legal frameworks that shaped these historical practices.
1. Old Testament Context
The Old Testament serves as the primary source for any discussion on “what bible verses tell a man to take another woman”. It is crucial to recognize that the societal structures, legal frameworks, and cultural norms differed significantly from contemporary Western cultures. Practices such as polygamy, though described, are not uniformly endorsed. Their prevalence often arose from a convergence of factors: a desire to ensure male heirs to preserve family lines, the need to provide for widows who lacked other means of support, and the dynamics of power within patriarchal societies. Therefore, interpreting specific verses related to such unions necessitates a deep understanding of this context to avoid misinterpreting descriptive accounts as prescriptive mandates.
Consider the example of Abraham, who had a child with Hagar at Sarah’s behest due to her infertility. This action, while recorded in Genesis, is not presented as an ideal model for marriage but rather as a consequence of the social pressures and beliefs of the time. Similarly, Jacob’s marriages to Leah and Rachel were influenced by Laban’s deception and the societal importance of bearing children. These narratives highlight the cause-and-effect relationship between cultural expectations and the recorded behaviors. The legal codes within Deuteronomy, such as those regarding levirate marriage, further exemplify the attempt to regulate existing practices within a specific societal context. These codes indicate that multiple-partner relationships were part of the reality, even if it did not reflect any ideal marital arrangement.
In conclusion, the Old Testament context provides the essential backdrop against which to analyze accounts relating to multiple wives or concubines. This context emphasizes that these relationships were often products of specific socio-economic circumstances, legal obligations, and cultural expectations. Ignoring this context can lead to erroneous conclusions about the biblical perspective on marriage. Understanding the historical, cultural and legal landscape of the Old Testament helps illuminate the specific factors that gave rise to, and regulated, multiple unions which are the object of the phrase “what bible verses tell a man to take another woman.”
2. Absence of direct commandment
The core of interpreting “what bible verses tell a man to take another woman” resides in recognizing the absence of a direct commandment prescribing or advocating such unions. While the Old Testament recounts instances of polygamy and concubinage involving figures such as Abraham, Jacob, David, and Solomon, these narratives function as descriptions of historical practices rather than divine endorsements. The significance of this absence lies in its implication that these relationships were permitted within a specific societal framework but were never presented as a universal ideal or a divinely ordained obligation. To interpret these accounts as endorsements disregards the narrative nuances and potential critiques embedded within the stories themselves.
The practical significance of acknowledging the “Absence of direct commandment” is significant. The Old Testament contains legal stipulations that aimed to regulate multiple-partner relationships, suggesting an attempt to mitigate potential injustices or imbalances within these unions. For example, laws concerning inheritance and the treatment of the first wife indicate a concern for equity in circumstances where polygamy existed. Had these been divinely ordained practices, regulatory laws that seem to address potential negative consequences might be absent or markedly different. Moreover, the New Testament presents a different marital standard, with Jesus reaffirming the creation narratives emphasis on a monogamous relationship between one man and one woman. This shift suggests a re-evaluation of marital norms in light of a new covenant.
In conclusion, the lack of a direct commandment advocating for polygamy within the scriptures fundamentally shapes understanding of “what bible verses tell a man to take another woman.” It compels a contextual reading that considers the historical, social, and legal dimensions of these accounts. It highlights the need to view those relationships not as sanctioned ideals but as reflections of a specific time and place. It further demands a consideration of the broader biblical narrative to contextualize the nuances of marital expectations. This understanding is crucial for interpreting biblical passages related to marital unions with historical accuracy and theological depth.
3. Polygamy as description, not prescription
Understanding the distinction between polygamy as a descriptive element within biblical narratives and as a prescriptive mandate is crucial for interpreting “what bible verses tell a man to take another woman.” The presence of polygamous relationships in the Old Testament does not equate to an endorsement or command for such unions. Recognizing this difference guides the analysis of specific verses, preventing misinterpretations and promoting a nuanced understanding of historical practices versus theological ideals.
-
Narrative Function
Polygamous relationships often serve specific narrative functions within the biblical text. These relationships may highlight social dynamics, illustrate the consequences of choices, or serve as a backdrop for showcasing God’s interactions with flawed individuals. For example, Jacob’s multiple marriages, driven by deception and societal expectations, create complex family dynamics that influence the unfolding of the story of Israel. The story doesn’t endorse his actions but rather describes the circumstances, highlighting the consequences of choices and actions. These relationships advance the plot and expose human fallibility. It is therefore essential to discern the narrative purpose of such accounts rather than extracting prescriptive guidelines from them.
-
Legal Regulations as Evidence
The existence of legal regulations concerning polygamous relationships within the Old Testament provides additional evidence that these arrangements were being managed rather than prescribed. Laws addressing inheritance rights, the treatment of multiple wives, and the protection of the first wife suggest an attempt to mitigate potential injustices within existing social practices. Such regulations would be unnecessary if polygamy was a divinely mandated ideal. The laws indicate that these relationships were a reality that required societal and legal management. They reflect a pragmatic approach to dealing with existing social structures rather than an endorsement of the structures themselves.
-
Contrast with Monogamous Ideals
While the Old Testament contains descriptions of polygamous relationships, it also includes passages that emphasize the ideal of a monogamous union. The creation narrative in Genesis, where God creates one man and one woman, is often cited as a foundational representation of marriage. This narrative provides a counterpoint to the instances of polygamy, suggesting a different, perhaps more ideal, vision of marital union. The juxtaposition of these narratives highlights that polygamy was not necessarily the ideal, even if it was a practiced reality. This contrast contributes to the understanding that polygamy functions as a descriptive element, reflecting historical realities rather than prescriptive instruction.
-
New Testament Affirmation of Monogamy
The New Testament presents a clear affirmation of monogamy. Jesus references the creation narrative and reaffirms the concept of one man and one woman becoming one flesh. Paul’s letters also emphasize the importance of marital fidelity and the union between one husband and one wife. This shift in emphasis reinforces the understanding that polygamy, as depicted in the Old Testament, was not a universally endorsed practice. The New Testament emphasizes a monogamous relationship as the ideal, thereby further solidifying the distinction between description and prescription. In considering what bible verses tell a man to take another woman, it’s vital to reconcile Old Testament depictions with the New Testament emphasis on monogamy to arrive at a more complete understanding.
These facets clarify the role of polygamy within biblical narratives. Examining the narrative function, legal regulations, and the presence of monogamous ideals, it can be inferred that it serves as a descriptive element rather than a prescriptive one. The New Testament’s re-affirmation of monogamy provides a critical lens that highlights the descriptive nature of any Old Testament passages referencing what has become known as “what bible verses tell a man to take another woman.
4. Levirate marriage exception
The levirate marriage, as detailed in Deuteronomy 25:5-10, forms a specific exception to general marital norms and contributes to the discussion of “what bible verses tell a man to take another woman.” It mandates that if a married man dies without leaving a son, his brother is obligated to marry the widow to continue the deceased brother’s lineage. This practice, while potentially resulting in a man taking his brothers widow as wife, stems from concerns distinct from typical instances of polygamy. It focuses on familial preservation rather than personal desire.
-
Lineage Preservation as Primary Goal
The central purpose of the levirate marriage is to ensure the continuation of the deceased brother’s lineage. The first son born from this union is legally considered the heir of the deceased brother, carrying on his name and inheritance. This contrasts with other instances of polygamy where the primary motivation might be procreation, status, or economic factors. The levirate marriage specifically addresses the societal need to prevent the extinction of a family line, even if it involves a man taking his brother’s widow as wife. Ruth’s story exemplifies this in action, though Boaz was a kinsman-redeemer rather than a brother, highlighting the broader principle of family responsibility.
-
Obligation and Social Duty
The levirate marriage is presented as a legal and social obligation. The surviving brother does not have a choice in the matter unless he publicly refuses, a refusal accompanied by social stigma and a specific ceremony involving the widow removing his sandal. This underscores that the practice is rooted in duty rather than personal inclination. It differs from polygamy where the man’s decision to take multiple wives is generally portrayed as a matter of choice, influenced by personal desires or societal pressures. The levirate marriage emphasizes communal responsibility to ensure family continuity and social stability.
-
Distinction from Polygamous Intent
The levirate marriage differs fundamentally from the motivations typically associated with polygamy. It is not about a man desiring additional wives for procreation or status enhancement. Instead, it is a specific remedy designed to address the unique circumstance of a childless widow. The resulting union is directly tied to the deceased brothers lineage, not to the surviving brothers personal lineage or desires. This distinction is critical in assessing “what bible verses tell a man to take another woman” because it clarifies that the levirate marriage operates under a different set of principles than general polygamous practices.
-
Limited Scope and Application
The levirate marriage is applicable only in specific circumstances, namely when a man dies without a son. This limited scope further differentiates it from general polygamy, which could be practiced regardless of the presence of existing heirs. The specificity of the levirate law indicates it is an exception designed to address a particular problem, rather than a widespread endorsement of multiple-partner unions. Its limited application suggests that it is a targeted intervention, not a broad affirmation of a man’s right or desire to take additional wives beyond his primary spouse.
These facets, emphasizing lineage preservation, obligation, distinct intent, and limited scope, establish the levirate marriage as a unique exception within the broader context of “what bible verses tell a man to take another woman.” The analysis underscores that it is a socially mandated duty aimed at preserving family lines, rather than an endorsement of polygamy driven by personal desires. The levirate marriage should not be conflated with other instances of men marrying multiple women. Instead, it should be understood as a distinct response to the specific challenge of maintaining lineage in the absence of a male heir.
5. Lineage and inheritance
The connection between lineage and inheritance is central to understanding instances described by “what bible verses tell a man to take another woman.” In ancient Israelite society, the continuation of family lines and the transmission of property were of paramount importance. The desire to ensure male heirs to inherit land and maintain the family name significantly influenced marital practices. This emphasis provides the motivation behind certain passages that depict or address polygamy and concubinage. When a wife was infertile or produced only daughters, taking another wife or concubine was sometimes seen as a means to secure male offspring and guarantee the continuation of the lineage and the rightful transfer of inheritance.
Biblical narratives illustrate this connection. Abraham took Hagar at Sarah’s suggestion to bear a child because Sarah was unable to conceive. This was driven by the need for an heir, highlighting the societal pressure to maintain lineage. Jacob’s multiple marriages and the subsequent birth of numerous sons established the twelve tribes of Israel, directly linking lineage and inheritance to the formation of the nation’s identity and land distribution. The legal frameworks within Deuteronomy also addressed the complexities of inheritance in polygamous households, demonstrating an attempt to regulate these practices while acknowledging their prevalence. These laws underscore the importance of fair distribution of inheritance to all sons, regardless of their mother’s status, mitigating potential conflicts arising from multiple wives and offspring.
Understanding the interplay between lineage and inheritance provides context for interpreting seemingly problematic biblical passages. The focus on ensuring the continuation of the family name and the orderly transfer of property sheds light on why polygamy and concubinage, while not explicitly endorsed, were tolerated or regulated within the ancient Israelite social structure. Recognizing this connection allows for a more nuanced understanding of these practices, moving beyond a simplistic condemnation or endorsement to appreciate the historical, social, and legal factors that shaped them. Therefore, lineage and inheritance provides a critical lens for interpreting what has become known as “what bible verses tell a man to take another woman”.
6. Social stability factors
Social stability factors significantly influenced marital practices described within “what bible verses tell a man to take another woman.” In ancient Israelite society, maintaining social order was paramount, and marital arrangements often served purposes beyond individual desires. Polygamy, concubinage, and levirate marriage, while described in scripture, frequently addressed concerns about lineage preservation, economic security, and the provision for vulnerable individuals, contributing to the overall stability of the community. These factors necessitate a contextual understanding when analyzing biblical texts relating to these practices.
The need to provide for widows and ensure their economic security represents one example of social stability factors influencing marital customs. In a society where women lacked independent economic means, marrying a deceased husband’s brother (levirate marriage) or becoming a concubine provided a means of support and integration into a family structure, preventing them from becoming burdens on the community. Similarly, polygamy sometimes arose in situations where a wife was barren. Securing male heirs ensured the continuation of family lines and the proper inheritance of property, preventing disputes and maintaining the established social order. Narratives involving figures such as Abraham and Jacob illustrate how these concerns directly impacted marital decisions. Legal codes within the Old Testament, such as those regulating inheritance rights in polygamous households, further reflect an attempt to manage potential disruptions and maintain social equilibrium.
In conclusion, social stability factors played a crucial role in shaping marital practices described in “what bible verses tell a man to take another woman.” Understanding these factors allows for a more nuanced interpretation of these texts, appreciating the complex interplay between societal needs, individual desires, and legal frameworks. Recognizing the historical context and the societal implications of these practices is essential to avoid misinterpreting them as universal endorsements of polygamy or concubinage. The emphasis on social stability sheds light on the pragmatism that often influenced marital decisions, contributing to a deeper comprehension of the biblical narrative.
7. Protection of first wife
The concept of protecting the rights and status of the first wife emerges as a critical element in passages relating to what bible verses tell a man to take another woman. Recognizing the inherent potential for inequity in polygamous relationships, legal codes within the Old Testament contain provisions aimed at safeguarding the first wife’s well-being. These protections represent an attempt to mitigate potential disadvantages arising from the introduction of additional wives, reflecting a concern for fairness within a societal structure that permitted multiple unions. The existence of such regulations underscores the acknowledgement that a man’s decision to take another woman could adversely impact the first wife, thus necessitating legal and social safeguards.
Deuteronomy 21:15-17 illustrates this concern. It stipulates that a man cannot favor the son of a beloved, later wife over the firstborn son of the first wife when distributing inheritance, even if the first wife is less favored. This demonstrates a legal effort to prevent the first wife and her offspring from being marginalized in favor of a newer wife and her children. The law emphasizes the inherent rights of the firstborn son, regardless of the mother’s position in the household. This provides a clear example of how biblical law attempted to balance the complexities of polygamous relationships, ensuring the first wife’s offspring would not be unjustly disadvantaged. These regulations are testaments to the acknowledgment that what bible verses tell a man to take another woman could potentially create imbalance that needed legal redress.
In conclusion, the protection of the first wife stands as a significant consideration within biblical passages addressing polygamy. The legal and social safeguards implemented demonstrate an awareness of the potential for injustice and an attempt to mitigate the negative consequences for the first wife and her children. Recognizing these provisions offers a more comprehensive understanding of these passages, highlighting the efforts to balance societal norms with ethical considerations and underlining the complexities inherent in the historical context described within what bible verses tell a man to take another woman. These are not endorsements but managed co-existence frameworks.
8. Children’s rights
In the context of scriptural passages describing what bible verses tell a man to take another woman, the subject of childrens rights assumes considerable importance. The rights of children born within polygamous or concubine relationships are addressed, albeit indirectly, through legal and social provisions intended to ensure their well-being and equitable treatment. These provisions are typically tied to inheritance, legitimacy, and the obligation of the father to provide for all his offspring, irrespective of their mothers status. The practical effect of these rights is intertwined with the lineage and social standing afforded to each child, as the recognition of their place within the family structure determines access to resources and social recognition. For instance, the explicit laws regulating inheritance sought to protect the interests of children born to less favored wives, demonstrating a concern for preventing disparity amongst the offspring of one man.
The legal frameworks found within the Old Testament attempted to manage potential conflicts and imbalances that might arise in polygamous households regarding the children. The entitlement to inheritance, the right to paternal recognition, and the access to social standing within the community are crucial aspects of children’s rights in these contexts. For instance, Deuteronomy’s prescription against favoring the son of a preferred wife over the firstborn son of a less favored wife demonstrates a clear attempt to enforce equitable treatment. The absence of absolute equality in social status did not negate the fundamental right to be recognized as a legitimate member of the family, entitling them to paternal support and social inclusion. The understanding of children’s rights within these passages is thus pivotal for a comprehensive interpretation of what bible verses tell a man to take another woman, as these rights shaped the social and legal landscape in which these marital practices were embedded.
Ultimately, while the concept of children’s rights was not articulated in the same way as modern international law, the legal and social provisions within the Old Testament aimed to address the welfare and equitable treatment of children born within polygamous unions. These provisions, although limited in scope, represent an effort to mitigate potential disadvantages and ensure the basic rights of all offspring, regardless of their mother’s social standing. Understanding this dynamic is vital for a nuanced reading of scriptural passages describing what bible verses tell a man to take another woman. By considering the impact on children, one can gain a more comprehensive appreciation of the complexities inherent in these historical practices and their societal implications.
9. Regulation attempts
Regulation attempts within the Old Testament legal codes directly relate to what bible verses tell a man to take another woman. These attempts reveal an effort to manage and mitigate potential negative consequences arising from polygamous relationships. They do not endorse polygamy but rather acknowledge its existence and seek to impose limitations and guidelines to ensure fairness and social stability.
-
Inheritance Laws
Inheritance laws stand as prominent examples of regulation attempts. Deuteronomy 21:15-17 stipulates that a man cannot favor the son of a beloved, later wife over the firstborn son of the first wife when distributing inheritance. This regulation aimed to prevent injustice and ensure that the first wife’s offspring received their rightful inheritance, regardless of the father’s preference for another wife. The purpose was to maintain equity and prevent potential familial strife over property and lineage.
-
Treatment of Wives
Regulations concerning the treatment of wives reflect further attempts to manage polygamous relationships. Although not explicitly detailed in comprehensive codes, implicit directives within the law suggest obligations to provide for and treat all wives equitably. This stemmed from the understanding that multiple wives could lead to jealousy, neglect, and unequal treatment. While specific penalties for violating these implied obligations are not always stated, the underlying principle suggests an attempt to establish baseline standards of care and respect for all women within such relationships.
-
Levirate Marriage Constraints
Levirate marriage, while seemingly promoting a form of regulated polygamy, also contained inherent constraints. The obligation for a brother to marry his deceased brother’s widow was not without limits. Refusal triggered social stigma and a specified ritual humiliation, signaling the community’s disapproval of shirking familial duty. This regulation, aimed at preserving lineage, also implicitly constrained the circumstances under which a man could take his brother’s widow as a wife, highlighting an attempt to control even sanctioned forms of multiple-partner unions.
-
Divorce Restrictions
Although divorce was permitted under certain circumstances in the Old Testament, regulations surrounding divorce in polygamous contexts aimed to provide some level of protection for wives. While specific restrictions varied, the underlying principle involved ensuring a divorced wife received adequate provision and was not simply discarded. This, again, wasn’t related solely to polygamous relationships. Divorce regulations overall sought to prevent arbitrary or unjust treatment of women, acknowledging their vulnerability and the need for societal intervention to protect their interests. While specific verses in the Old Testament addresses some aspects of divorce (Deut 24:1-4) these restrictions indirectly regulated aspects of polygamous arrangements.
These regulation attempts, manifest in inheritance laws, treatment of wives directives, constraints on levirate marriage, and restrictions on divorce, all shed light on how ancient Israelite society sought to manage polygamous relationships. These efforts provide a context for interpreting what bible verses tell a man to take another woman, demonstrating that while polygamy was described, it was also subject to legal and social constraints intended to mitigate potential harms and maintain social order. In essence, it was not endorsed. It was managed.
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding “What Bible Verses Tell A Man To Take Another Woman”
The following questions address common inquiries and misconceptions surrounding scriptural passages related to men entering into unions with multiple women. The responses aim to provide clarity based on biblical context and scholarly interpretations.
Question 1: Does the Bible explicitly command or endorse polygamy?
The Bible does not explicitly command or endorse polygamy. While the Old Testament recounts instances of men having multiple wives, these accounts function as descriptions of historical practices rather than divine mandates. The New Testament offers a contrasting view by emphasizing monogamy.
Question 2: Are there specific reasons why polygamy was practiced in the Old Testament?
Polygamy in the Old Testament often arose from a confluence of factors. A need to ensure male heirs for lineage preservation, providing security for widows, and conforming to certain social norms of the time contributed to its practice.
Question 3: How did Old Testament law attempt to regulate polygamous relationships?
Old Testament law included provisions aimed at regulating polygamous relationships. Regulations covered inheritance rights, the treatment of the first wife, and other concerns to mitigate potential injustices inherent in such unions.
Question 4: What is the significance of the levirate marriage in discussions about polygamy?
Levirate marriage, where a brother marries his deceased brother’s widow, represented a specific exception focused on maintaining lineage. It served a distinct social purpose rather than reflecting a general endorsement of polygamy.
Question 5: How does the New Testament view compare to the Old Testament view on marriage?
The New Testament reinforces monogamy as the marital ideal. Jesus references the creation narrative to emphasize the union of one man and one woman, offering a different perspective from the descriptive accounts of polygamy in the Old Testament.
Question 6: Does the presence of polygamy in the Bible mean it is acceptable today?
The historical and cultural context of polygamy in the Bible differs significantly from contemporary societal norms. While the Bible records instances of polygamy, it does not follow that it is necessarily condoned or recommended as a practice applicable in all times and places, particularly given the New Testament’s emphasis on monogamy.
In summary, understanding what bible verses tell a man to take another woman needs a deep dive. While accounts exist, a command structure lacks, especially within a modern interpretation.
The following section moves to a conclusion.
Navigating Scriptural Passages on Multiple Marriages
When engaging with biblical texts that recount a man’s union with multiple women, a rigorous and nuanced approach is required. The following points provide a framework for informed interpretation.
Tip 1: Prioritize Contextual Understanding: Acknowledge the vast differences between ancient Near Eastern societies and contemporary cultures. Factors such as lineage preservation, social stability, and economic necessities profoundly shaped marital practices. Recognize that what bible verses tell a man to take another woman must be interpreted in specific historical context.
Tip 2: Distinguish Description from Prescription: Differentiate between accounts that describe polygamy and directives that endorse it. The Old Testament narratives provide historical context but do not necessarily advocate for or command these practices.
Tip 3: Consider Legal Codes as Regulators: Recognize that legal codes addressing polygamous relationships were attempts to manage and mitigate potential inequities, not endorsements of polygamy itself. Such codes sought to safeguard the rights of the first wife and the children, demonstrating a concern for fairness within these relationships.
Tip 4: Examine the New Testament Perspective: Integrate the New Testament’s emphasis on monogamy into your analysis. This provides a contrasting viewpoint that reinforces the concept of marriage as a union between one man and one woman, as reinforced by many interpretations of scripture.
Tip 5: Acknowledge the Absence of Direct Commandment: Appreciate the absence of a direct command advocating polygamy. Its absence is significant as it suggests it was permitted within specific societal frameworks but never presented as a universal ideal or a divinely ordained obligation.
Tip 6: Assess Social Stability Factors: Evaluate how polygamous relationships addressed concerns about social stability such as providing for widows and securing male heirs. Recognizing the influence of these factors helps in understanding the rationale behind these practices.
Tip 7: Understand Lineage and Inheritance: Examine the role of lineage and inheritance in driving marital practices. The desire to ensure male heirs for the continuation of the family name and the transmission of property significantly influenced the prevalence and acceptance of polygamy.
Engaging with scriptural passages referencing “what bible verses tell a man to take another woman” requires careful consideration of historical context, legal codes, and the broader theological themes present within the Bible. A rigorous analytical approach avoids simplistic interpretations and promotes informed understanding.
The following concludes the article.
Conclusion
The exploration of what bible verses tell a man to take another woman reveals a complex interplay of historical, social, and legal factors within the Old Testament. While instances of polygamy and concubinage are recorded, these descriptions exist within specific cultural contexts and are not presented as divine endorsements. The absence of a direct commandment, coupled with legal attempts to regulate such relationships and protect the rights of first wives and children, underscores a nuanced perspective. It is crucial to distinguish between descriptive accounts and prescriptive mandates, acknowledging that these practices served particular societal functions within a specific historical framework.
Continued engagement with these passages necessitates a rigorous contextual analysis, integrating an understanding of lineage, social stability, and ethical considerations. A balanced approach considers both the Old Testament narratives and the New Testament’s emphasis on monogamy. Critical interpretation ensures informed understanding of the historical context described within what bible verses tell a man to take another woman, facilitating a thoughtful examination of the cultural norms in the ancient texts.
