In the context of interviews at Meta (Facebook), the terms “reviewer” and “shareholder” refer to distinct roles individuals play in the hiring process. A reviewer is someone who evaluates a candidate’s performance during an interview, providing feedback on technical skills, problem-solving abilities, and communication. A shareholder, in this context, is generally a more senior person or someone from a team that the candidate may be joining. Shareholders have a vested interest in the hiring decision and their input often carries significant weight. For instance, a reviewer might assess a candidate’s coding proficiency, while a shareholder might evaluate whether the candidate’s experience aligns with the team’s long-term goals and culture.
The significance of these roles lies in their contribution to a comprehensive and unbiased assessment of potential hires. By involving multiple individuals with varying perspectives, Meta aims to mitigate individual biases and ensure that new employees possess the skills and cultural fit necessary for success. Historically, relying solely on a single interviewer often resulted in suboptimal hiring decisions. The reviewer/shareholder model provides a more robust and equitable evaluation process, ultimately leading to a higher quality workforce. This approach is particularly important in a large and complex organization like Meta, where effective teamwork and collaboration are essential.
