The phrase signifies the act of examining and rectifying errors or deficiencies in a document, application, or any type of submission before it undergoes a formal evaluation process. This proactive measure ensures that readily identifiable issues are addressed upfront, enhancing the overall quality and accuracy of the material being presented. For example, in the context of a grant application, this process could involve identifying and fixing formatting errors, missing information, or inconsistencies in the proposed budget before the application is officially submitted for review.
Undertaking this preliminary review offers several advantages. It reduces the likelihood of rejection or negative feedback due to easily avoidable mistakes. It also demonstrates attention to detail and professionalism, positively influencing the perception of the submission. Historically, the concept has been applied across various sectors, from academic publishing to legal documentation, highlighting its role in streamlining processes and improving outcomes. The practice ultimately saves time and resources by preventing unnecessary delays and re-submissions.
