The inquiry concerns locating an individual named Daniel Pascente geographically. Specifically, it seeks to determine the U.S. state that serves as his primary base of operations or residence. This information could be relevant for various purposes, such as verifying contact details, establishing jurisdiction, or understanding his business affiliations.
Knowing someone’s location is often crucial for effective communication and accurate record-keeping. In legal or business contexts, the correct state of residence can be a determining factor for compliance and contractual obligations. Historical context plays a lesser role in this particular query, as the focus is on the individual’s current or most recent known location.
The subsequent analysis will delve into methods for ascertaining the state of residence for Daniel Pascente. This may involve examining public records, professional directories, or news articles, with the ultimate aim of providing a definitive answer to the initial question.
1. Public Records
Public records serve as a critical source of information in determining an individual’s location. When seeking to identify the state where Daniel Pascente is based, these records provide verifiable data points that contribute to establishing a location.
-
Property Ownership Records
Property ownership records, typically maintained at the county level, can reveal if Daniel Pascente owns real estate in a particular state. These records include details such as the property address, purchase date, and owner’s name. A consistent address across multiple property ownership records suggests a state where Pascente maintains a residence or business presence.
-
Voter Registration Data
Voter registration records, generally accessible through state or local election offices, provide an address declared by an individual for voting purposes. While not always indicative of current residence, voter registration can offer a historical snapshot of Pascente’s declared address in a specific state. These records might include additional information such as party affiliation and registration date.
-
Business Filings and Licenses
Business filings with state agencies, such as the Secretary of State, provide information on registered businesses. If Daniel Pascente is associated with a business, these filings might include a principal business address within a specific state. Professional licenses, such as those for lawyers, doctors, or contractors, also list an address associated with the licensee, often indicating where they conduct their professional activities.
-
Court Records
Court records, including civil and criminal proceedings, are public information in most jurisdictions. If Daniel Pascente has been involved in legal proceedings, the court records may contain his address at the time of the filing. These records can provide insights into his location during specific periods, especially if the legal matters were local to a particular state.
The analysis of public records offers valuable insights into the potential state of residence or operation for Daniel Pascente. Combining data from various sources, such as property ownership, voter registration, business filings, and court records, strengthens the reliability of the conclusion regarding his location. Discrepancies between these sources necessitate further investigation to ascertain the most accurate determination.
2. Professional Licenses
Professional licenses offer a tangible link to an individual’s operational base. Examining licenses held by Daniel Pascente can provide direct evidence of the state where he conducts professional activities, contributing significantly to determining his primary location.
-
License Issuance State
The state issuing a professional license directly indicates where an individual is authorized to practice their profession. If Daniel Pascente holds a license to practice law in Pennsylvania, for instance, this provides a strong indication that he operates, at least in part, within Pennsylvania. It is essential to verify the current status of the license to ensure it is active and valid.
-
Address of Record
Professional licenses typically require an address of record, which is publicly accessible. This address is often where the licensee receives official correspondence and conducts business. If the address listed on Daniel Pascente’s professional license is in New Jersey, it suggests a professional presence in that state. The address on file might be a business address or a residential address, both providing locational clues.
-
License Type and Scope
The specific type and scope of a professional license can also provide contextual clues. A statewide license suggests that Daniel Pascente can operate throughout the entire state, while a license tied to a specific locality might indicate a more focused operational area. For example, a city-specific contractor’s license implies activities primarily within that city’s jurisdiction.
-
Renewal and Continuing Education Requirements
Professional licenses often require periodic renewal and completion of continuing education courses. These activities typically occur within the state where the license is held. Evidence of Daniel Pascente completing continuing legal education in New York, for example, reinforces the possibility of his professional engagement in New York.
In summary, scrutinizing professional licenses associated with Daniel Pascente can provide a reliable means to determine his operational state. The license issuance state, address of record, license type, and renewal activities collectively contribute to a comprehensive understanding of his professional location. Examining these factors in conjunction with other data sources enhances the accuracy of identifying the state he is based out of.
3. Voter Registration
Voter registration records provide a declared address, serving as a potential indicator of an individual’s primary state of residence. In the context of determining the state where Daniel Pascente is based, voter registration information offers a snapshot of his asserted location at the time of registration. The accuracy of this data depends on the registrant’s adherence to updating their address upon relocation. For example, if Daniel Pascente registered to vote in Florida and the record reflects an address within that state, it suggests a connection to Florida at the time of registration. However, this information alone is insufficient to definitively establish his current state of residence without corroborating evidence from other sources.
The importance of voter registration in locating an individual lies in its accessibility as a public record. State election offices maintain these databases, allowing researchers and investigators to query them for address information. The practical application involves cross-referencing the voter registration address with other data points, such as property records or professional licenses. If Daniel Pascente’s voter registration aligns with a business address in Pennsylvania, it strengthens the likelihood of his operational base being in Pennsylvania. Discrepancies between the voter registration address and other records warrant further investigation to ascertain the most accurate representation of his location.
In summary, voter registration data serves as one piece of the puzzle when determining the state where Daniel Pascente is based. While not conclusive on its own, the address provided in voter registration records offers a valuable clue that, when combined with other evidence, contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of his geographical location. Challenges arise from outdated registration information or individuals maintaining multiple residences. Therefore, relying solely on voter registration data poses risks and necessitates a multi-faceted approach.
4. Property Ownership
Property ownership records constitute a significant source of information for determining an individual’s state of residence. The presence of Daniel Pascente’s name on property deeds within a specific state offers a tangible indication of his potential geographical location, whether for residential or business purposes.
-
Residential Property Ownership
If Daniel Pascente owns a residential property in a particular state, this suggests a likelihood of his residence being in that state. Examination of property deeds, mortgage documents, and tax records associated with the property can confirm ownership and provide an address of record. For example, if property records in California list Daniel Pascente as the owner of a home, it indicates a possible connection to California as his state of residence. However, it is essential to verify whether the property is actively used as a primary residence or serves as a secondary home or investment.
-
Commercial Property Ownership
Ownership of commercial property can indicate a state where Daniel Pascente conducts business activities. If he owns an office building or retail space in Texas, it implies a business presence within that state. Corporate filings and business licenses associated with the property can further corroborate his involvement. Determining whether the business is actively operating and the extent of his participation provides additional insight into his state affiliation. It’s crucial to distinguish between ownership of property used for personal business and investment properties leased to unrelated third parties.
-
Co-Ownership and Trusts
Property ownership may involve co-owners or the use of trusts, which can complicate the determination of an individual’s primary state of residence. If Daniel Pascente co-owns property with family members or business partners, the property’s location might not necessarily reflect his primary residence. Similarly, if the property is held in a trust, the trust documents must be examined to ascertain his role and association with the property. Clarifying the nature of the ownership structure provides a more accurate interpretation of its relevance to determining his state of residence.
-
Out-of-State Ownership
Ownership of property in a state different from where an individual primarily resides is not uncommon. Daniel Pascente may own vacation homes, rental properties, or land in a state other than his primary residence. While this indicates a connection to that state, it does not necessarily imply that it is his primary base of operations. This is especially important when the individual has known connections to multiple states. In these cases, the state where he spends the majority of his time and engages in his professional or business activities is often his primary location.
Analyzing property ownership records provides valuable clues to Daniel Pascente’s state of residence. However, these records should be considered in conjunction with other indicators, such as voter registration, professional licenses, and business affiliations, to form a comprehensive determination of his primary location. The nature of the property, the ownership structure, and other indicators must be carefully evaluated to draw accurate conclusions.
5. Business Affiliations
The examination of business affiliations provides crucial insights into determining the state where Daniel Pascente is based. These associations offer tangible evidence of his professional activities and operational base, aiding in the accurate identification of his primary location.
-
Registered Business Addresses
When Daniel Pascente is listed as an officer, director, or registered agent of a company, the state of incorporation and the business’s principal place of business offer strong indicators of his operational state. For instance, if corporate filings with the Delaware Secretary of State show Daniel Pascente as the CEO of a company with its primary office in Wilmington, Delaware, this suggests a professional connection to Delaware. However, the actual operational base may differ if the company maintains its physical offices and workforce elsewhere.
-
Professional Partnerships and Associations
Affiliations with professional partnerships, law firms, or industry associations can reveal the state where Daniel Pascente conducts a significant portion of his work. Membership in a state bar association or a partner position in a law firm based in New York City, for example, indicates a strong professional connection to New York. These associations often require a physical presence or regular activity within the state, making them reliable indicators of an operational base.
-
Investment and Ownership Stakes
Investment in or ownership stakes in businesses located in a particular state can suggest a vested interest and active involvement in that region. If Daniel Pascente is a major shareholder in a company headquartered in Texas, it implies a degree of influence and oversight that necessitates his presence or engagement within Texas. However, passive investments without active management provide less definitive evidence of his primary location.
-
Client Base and Service Area
The geographical distribution of Daniel Pascente’s clients or the service area of his business can provide insights into the state where he primarily operates. If his business primarily serves clients within California, it suggests that he maintains a significant operational presence in California. This is particularly relevant for service-based businesses where proximity to clients is essential. Analyzing client lists and service contracts can reveal the geographical concentration of his business activities.
Analyzing these business affiliations provides a multi-faceted view of Daniel Pascente’s professional engagements and potential state of operation. By correlating registered business addresses, professional partnerships, investment stakes, and client distribution, it becomes feasible to ascertain the state that serves as his primary base of operations, or alternatively, to identify multiple states with which he maintains significant professional ties.
6. Legal Filings
Legal filings, as publicly accessible records, offer a verifiable source of information that can contribute to determining the state where an individual is based. These records often contain addresses and other identifying information that can be cross-referenced with other data points to establish a more comprehensive understanding of an individual’s location.
-
Civil Lawsuits
Civil lawsuits in which Daniel Pascente is a plaintiff or defendant often include his address at the time of the filing. The location of the court where the lawsuit is filed can also provide clues to his whereabouts, as civil actions are typically brought in jurisdictions where the defendant resides or where the cause of action occurred. Examination of complaints, answers, and other court documents may reveal addresses or other information connecting him to a specific state.
-
Bankruptcy Records
Bankruptcy filings require debtors to list their current address and principal place of business. If Daniel Pascente has filed for bankruptcy, these records would include his declared location at the time of the filing. Bankruptcy filings are federal records, and the location of the bankruptcy court can indicate the state where he resided or operated a business when the petition was filed.
-
Criminal Records
Criminal records, including arrest records, indictments, and convictions, typically contain the defendant’s address. If Daniel Pascente has a criminal record, these filings may include his address at the time of the alleged offense and during subsequent legal proceedings. The location of the court where the case was heard provides additional context regarding his connection to the state where the crime occurred.
-
Real Estate Transactions
Legal filings related to real estate transactions, such as mortgages, deeds of trust, and foreclosure actions, can also provide address information. If Daniel Pascente has been involved in buying, selling, or mortgaging property, these records will include the property’s location and his address at the time of the transaction. The county recorder’s office in the state where the property is located will maintain these records.
In conclusion, legal filings offer a valuable but not definitive means of determining the state where Daniel Pascente is based. These records, when analyzed collectively and cross-referenced with other sources, contribute to a more accurate assessment of his geographic location and potential connections to specific states. However, the information contained in legal filings may not always reflect his current address due to the time lag between filing and the present day, requiring consideration of additional factors.
7. Online Presence
An individual’s online presence can offer clues, though often indirect, regarding their geographic location. Digital footprints, when analyzed carefully, may provide data points that suggest the state where a person is based, requiring a critical approach to avoid inaccurate assumptions.
-
Social Media Profiles
Social media profiles on platforms like LinkedIn, Facebook, or Twitter can list a user’s current or past locations. While not always up-to-date or accurate, these profiles may indicate a state of residence or employment. For example, a LinkedIn profile stating “Works at [Company Name] in California” suggests a professional connection to California. However, reliance solely on social media profiles carries risks due to potential inaccuracies or outdated information.
-
Website and Blog Content
Personal websites or blogs may contain information about an individual’s location, such as a contact address, an “About Me” section mentioning their city or state, or references to local events or organizations. If Daniel Pascente maintains a blog with posts about activities in Arizona, it suggests a connection to Arizona. However, the website may not reflect their current location, particularly if it has not been updated recently.
-
Online Business Listings
If Daniel Pascente is associated with a business, online directories like Yelp, Google My Business, or industry-specific websites may list the business’s address and contact information. This can provide a direct indication of the state where he operates professionally. A listing on a legal directory with an address in Florida, for example, suggests a professional presence in Florida. Accuracy depends on the business keeping its online listings current.
-
Public Records Search Engines
Several online search engines aggregate public records, including property ownership, business affiliations, and legal filings. While these search engines may not directly reveal a current address, they can provide historical data points linking an individual to specific states. A search yielding property records in Illinois suggests a past or present connection to Illinois. However, the information may be incomplete or outdated, necessitating verification with official sources.
While an individual’s online presence provides potential clues, it should not be considered a definitive source for determining their location. The accuracy and recency of online information vary significantly, and cross-referencing with official records is essential for reliable conclusions regarding where Daniel Pascente is based. The online world offers leads, but verification remains crucial.
8. News Articles
News articles can serve as a valuable, albeit often indirect, source for determining an individual’s state of residence or operational base. When seeking to ascertain “daniel pascente based out of what state,” news reports may provide contextual clues about his activities, affiliations, or events attended, thereby suggesting a geographic connection. This connection is rooted in the tendency for local news outlets to cover individuals and events relevant to their readership or viewership. For example, if Daniel Pascente is frequently mentioned in articles published by a newspaper based in Pennsylvania, discussing his involvement in local business ventures or community initiatives, it indicates a likely association with that state. The strength of this indicator increases with the frequency and nature of the coverage.
However, reliance on news articles requires careful discernment. News coverage may be sporadic, focusing on a specific event or accomplishment that does not necessarily reflect the individual’s primary location. Furthermore, inaccuracies can occur in news reporting, underscoring the need for verification with other reliable sources. A practical application involves utilizing news archives and online search engines to identify articles mentioning Daniel Pascente, analyzing the geographic focus of the publications, and assessing the content for locational clues. For instance, a report detailing his role in a legal case heard in a Florida court not only places him in Florida at the time of the proceedings but also suggests a possible connection to that state.
In summary, news articles offer a potential avenue for identifying the state where Daniel Pascente is based, providing contextual information about his activities and affiliations. The challenge lies in assessing the reliability and relevance of the coverage, cross-referencing the information with other sources to establish a more definitive conclusion. This approach acknowledges the limitations of relying solely on news media while recognizing its potential to contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of an individual’s geographic location.
9. Contact Information
Contact information, encompassing addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses, serves as a direct indicator when determining the state where an individual is based. Accurate and verified contact details offer tangible evidence, facilitating the establishment of a geographic location.
-
Physical Address
A verified physical address, whether residential or business-related, directly links an individual to a specific state. This address, obtained from reliable sources such as public records or professional directories, provides a definitive geographic marker. For instance, if Daniel Pascente’s listed business address is in Austin, Texas, this strongly suggests a professional presence in Texas. However, verifying the currency of the address is essential to ensure it reflects his current location.
-
Phone Number Area Code
Phone number area codes offer a preliminary indication of geographic location. While area codes can be reassigned or used across state lines, they often correspond to a specific region. If Daniel Pascente’s primary phone number has a 215 area code, traditionally associated with Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, it implies a connection to that area. However, mobile phone numbers can be ported across states, requiring further confirmation to ascertain the individual’s actual location.
-
Email Address Domain
While less definitive than physical addresses, email addresses can provide contextual clues. If Daniel Pascente uses a professional email address associated with a company based in a particular state, it suggests a business affiliation with that location. For example, an email address ending in “@lawfirm.com,” where “lawfirm.com” is a law firm headquartered in New York, indicates a professional connection to New York. Personal email domains, however, offer limited insight into geographic location.
-
Billing Address
Billing addresses associated with credit cards, utilities, or other accounts provide another layer of information. If Daniel Pascente’s billing address for a credit card is consistently located in Illinois, this offers supporting evidence of a connection to Illinois. These addresses are typically verified by financial institutions, increasing their reliability as indicators of geographic location. However, the billing address may differ from the individual’s primary residence, particularly for seasonal residents or individuals with multiple properties.
In summary, contact information serves as a primary tool for determining the state where Daniel Pascente is based. While individual data points, such as area codes or email domains, offer preliminary insights, a comprehensive assessment of physical addresses, billing addresses, and verified phone numbers provides a more reliable indication of his geographic location. Cross-referencing these contact details with other sources, such as public records and professional licenses, enhances the accuracy of the final determination.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following questions address common inquiries related to determining the state where Daniel Pascente is based, focusing on methods, challenges, and the reliability of various information sources.
Question 1: What are the primary methods for determining the state where an individual, specifically Daniel Pascente, is based?
The principal methods involve examining public records, professional licenses, business affiliations, legal filings, and contact information. These sources provide verifiable data points that, when analyzed collectively, offer insights into an individual’s geographic location and potential connections to specific states.
Question 2: How reliable is online information, such as social media profiles, for ascertaining Daniel Pascente’s state of residence?
Online information, including social media profiles and personal websites, can provide clues but is not inherently reliable. The accuracy and recency of such data vary significantly. Cross-referencing online findings with official records and verified sources is crucial for drawing accurate conclusions.
Question 3: What role do property ownership records play in determining Daniel Pascente’s location?
Property ownership records offer a tangible indication of an individual’s potential presence in a specific state. Ownership of residential or commercial property suggests a connection to that geographic location. However, these records must be assessed in conjunction with other indicators to confirm whether the property represents a primary residence or business operation.
Question 4: What challenges might arise when attempting to pinpoint Daniel Pascente’s state of residence?
Challenges include outdated or incomplete information, individuals maintaining multiple residences, and the potential for discrepancies across various data sources. Additionally, reliance on a single source without corroboration can lead to inaccurate conclusions. A multi-faceted approach is necessary to mitigate these challenges.
Question 5: How can business affiliations contribute to identifying Daniel Pascente’s operational state?
Business affiliations, such as registered business addresses, professional partnerships, and investment stakes, can reveal the state where an individual conducts a significant portion of their professional activities. These associations offer insights into the individual’s operational base and potential geographic ties.
Question 6: To what extent can news articles be trusted as a source for determining Daniel Pascente’s location?
News articles can provide contextual clues regarding an individual’s activities and affiliations, potentially suggesting a geographic connection. However, news coverage may be sporadic or inaccurate, necessitating verification with other reliable sources. The geographic focus of the publication and the nature of the coverage are essential factors to consider.
The key takeaway is that determining an individual’s state of residence requires a comprehensive approach, utilizing multiple verifiable sources and acknowledging the limitations of each.
The subsequent section will address potential assumptions and biases that can influence the search for Daniel Pascente’s location.
Tips for Accurately Determining “Daniel Pascente Based Out of What State”
These guidelines are designed to aid in the accurate determination of an individual’s primary state of residence, focusing on the subject “Daniel Pascente based out of what state.” A comprehensive and methodical approach is crucial for achieving reliable results.
Tip 1: Prioritize Public Records. Public records, such as property ownership, voter registration, and business filings, offer verifiable data. Accessing these records through official government websites or authorized databases ensures accuracy and minimizes reliance on potentially misleading sources.
Tip 2: Cross-Reference Multiple Sources. Avoid relying solely on a single source of information. Confirm the information gathered by comparing it against at least two other independent sources. Discrepancies require further investigation to resolve inconsistencies and establish a reliable conclusion.
Tip 3: Verify Contact Information. Validate contact details, including addresses and phone numbers, through reputable directories or verification services. Addresses listed in public records should align with contact information provided in professional listings or business affiliations. Inconsistencies warrant scrutiny.
Tip 4: Analyze Professional Licenses Carefully. Scrutinize professional licenses held by the individual, noting the state of issuance and the listed address of record. Active, valid licenses provide stronger evidence of an operational base than expired or inactive ones.
Tip 5: Consider Business Affiliations in Context. Evaluate business affiliations in conjunction with the nature and scope of the associated activities. A passive investment provides less definitive evidence of a primary location than an active executive role within a company.
Tip 6: Maintain Records of All Searches. Thoroughly document all searches conducted and sources consulted. This practice ensures transparency and facilitates the replication or verification of findings by other researchers.
Tip 7: Be Aware of Information Recency. Recognize that data, especially online, may not always reflect current circumstances. Prioritize recently updated records and cross-validate information to ensure it remains accurate and relevant.
Applying these tips systematically enhances the likelihood of accurately determining the primary state of residence or operation for the subject individual. Rigorous methodology and critical assessment of all available data are essential for reliable results.
The subsequent steps will address the potential pitfalls of biased information and assumptions.
Determining Daniel Pascente’s State of Residence
The investigation into “daniel pascente based out of what state” underscores the necessity of a multi-faceted approach when ascertaining an individual’s geographic location. Public records, professional licenses, business affiliations, legal filings, online presence, news articles, and contact information each contribute valuable pieces to the puzzle. However, reliance on any single source proves insufficient, necessitating cross-referencing and validation to mitigate inaccuracies and inconsistencies.
Accurately establishing an individual’s state of residence carries significance in legal, business, and personal contexts. The findings of such investigations must be grounded in verifiable data and subjected to rigorous scrutiny. Continued diligence in gathering and assessing information remains paramount to ensuring reliable conclusions regarding the geographic location of Daniel Pascente, or any individual subject to similar inquiry.
